Sorry about the e-mail I accidentally sent with no added content. Travis Pahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in part:
>> >> Could be (both cases), and that would be interesting. It would >> >> demonstrate >> >> the efficacy of political activity -- that it's possible to get into >> >> positions of trust and then use that trust to produce a lasting change >> >> in >> >> direction. (It'll take a few more years to see if that's the case wit>h >> >> Republicans.) That would be all the more reason to encourage >> >> libertarians >> >> to get involved in conventional politics. >You said, "It'll take a few more years to see if that's the case with >Republicans." I am assuming what you are saying is that it will take >a few more years to see if they are really just obtaining a position >of trust and then using it to obtain a more libertarian position. No, I meant it may be that their leadership had obtained a position of trust and were using it to obtain a less conservative, and likely LESS libertarian position than otherwise. In Your Sly Tribe, Robert _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [email protected] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
