I realy do not care about their prrocedural votes. I am talking about votes on actual issues. And no, they are not already doing so. I read the legislative section of the paper where it tells how all the states legislatures voted. It is not even 50% for either major party.
On 8/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Travis Pahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in part: > > >As for what it would take from me? Well I would be willing to support > >them if 1/3 of them voted the same way I would at least 2/3rds of the > >time. > > I'd be surprised if they haven't been doing so already, and for quite a > while, if you count each vote equally. On 2nd thought, it's possible that > the large number of procedural votes would knock the ratio down closer to > 50:50. I mean, it might be a matter of chance whether you'd agree with > many on any particular vote to close discussion, etc. Usually those votes > move things according to the strategy of a party leadership, and if you > considered their strategy in your judgement, that might increase it > considerably from 50:50. > > In Your Sly Tribe, > Robert > _______________________________________________ > Libnw mailing list > [email protected] > List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw > Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw > _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [email protected] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
