On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 22:25 +0200, František Burian wrote: > Hi, Ormund, > > Beware that the F30x has peripherals like as F0, and F37x has > peripheral set near the F4 set. > Currently implemented is F30x, that is contained in STM32F3Discovery > board. > > I´m doing the unification of the peripheral set through entire stm32 > family, and still waiting for > a lot of my work to be pushed to the master, having clean starting > point for deeper unification. > During unification I didn't forgotten for F37x, but in the current > implementation i have no idea > how to differentiate between F30x and F37x by using same library for > both families. > I noticed the difference in the peripheral set between the F30x and the F37x but are you saying that its more than which peripheral but how they are implemented?
> It has been discussed heavily on the IRC channel, and multiple > solution exists. The implementation > of new processor has lower priority than finish of the organization of > common peripherals in the > existing ones. > > Feel free to create "F37" family directory, making the basic support > for irq.yaml and memorymap > for it, create the doxygen dirs and edit makefiles to make it > correctly as the starting point. > If i can remember it correctly, all peripherals there is implemented > now, therefore it's selection of > implementation for F37 will be fast after the reorganization of common > peripherals will be finished. > OK, I'll git clone master and start on this. Is your branch accessible? > Your impression is correct with limits. Some peripherals have some > different functions on different > platforms, and must be programmed as platform-dependent. The > unification that I am currently doing > is to grab all platform dependent code for given peripheral (seems > that this is a lot of code), and strip > out common functions that exists in all platforms that support the > peripheral. > > Do You have board with F37x processor ? > Yes, its a board I designed and I used a STM32F372CC, I also have a STM32F3Discovery board which has the STM32F303VC, it seems not as useful for development as I had hoped. > All informations containing in this email is provided as-is, as my > opinion, not opinion of the library > makers. I am only one from the set of currently active authors and > someone will direct you better > which work will help us best. Thanks Frantisek and best regards. -- Ormund ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ libopencm3-devel mailing list libopencm3-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libopencm3-devel
