On 16/02/14 08:56, Pavol Rusnak wrote: > On 01/15/2014 08:33 PM, Ken Sarkies wrote: >> 2. Can anyone verify that the function flash_program_option_bytes() in >> flash_common_f24.c is totally screwed and doesn't do anything like its >> name promises? The equivalent function for F1 seems to be on the right >> track. > Any news on this? Also does anyone have a working example? A port of > "FLASH Page Read/Write Protection" would be nice, e.g. > http://is.gd/xaC7pz (myST forums). Hi Pavol
I was mistaken. It actually does do what it should. The way the option bytes are programmed is completely different for F1 and F24. Ken > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android apps run on BlackBerry 10 Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ libopencm3-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libopencm3-devel
