I will be supporting all Wiki Loves Libraries content & announcements on both the GLAM-Wiki FB page and Twitter account, but if both exist already for WLL I'm happy for it to be changed to what's most relevant. I post about various GLAM goings ons on the GLAM-Wiki accounts consistently twice a day and I've been happy with the steady increase in followers / likes. (FB = 217 and Twitter = 280).
I try to promote the L in GLAM as much as I can - but could always use more content! : ) On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Bob Kosovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > I was looking at the latest revision to the Wikipedia Loves Libraries page > http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Loves_Libraries > and noticed at the bottom it says: > > "Follow us on T[witter] or F[acebook]. > > The Facebook link leads to the GLAMwiki page: > https://www.facebook.com/GLAMWIKI.US > > So should the Twitter link be to the @glamwiki account? > > Or should both be about Wikipedia Loves Libraries? (I know there is > neither a Twitter account or Facebook page for WLL). > > > > -- > Bob Kosovsky, Ph.D. -- Curator, Rare Books and Manuscripts, > Music Division, The New York Public Library for the Performing Arts > blog: http://www.nypl.org/blog/author/44 Twitter: @kos2 > Listowner: OPERA-L ; SMT-TALK ; SMT-ANNOUNCE ; SoundForge-users > - My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my institutions - > > > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries > > -- Lori Phillips Digital Marketing Content Coordinator The Children's Museum of Indianapolis US Cultural Partnerships Coordinator Wikimedia Foundation 703.489.6036 | http://loribyrdphillips.com/
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
