Feel free to ignore this suggestion but hasn't wiki loved libraries long enough, and shouldn't this be more of a two way street? I suggest #wikilib.
Merrilee From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dominic McDevitt-Parks Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:55 AM To: Wikimedia & Libraries Subject: Re: [libraries] Twitter? On 6/19/12 10:36 PM, Bob Kosovsky wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks <[email protected]> wrote: A WLL-related hashtag might be a good idea, though I think we should talk about whether we don't just want people tweeting on the main #glamwiki hashtag. In any case, though, I think #WLL is probably not distinctive enough, and we might want at least #WLL2012 (#wikiloveslib?). Which do you prefer: #WLL2012 or #WLL12? I like the second, only because it's shorter and easier to type faster. I kind of liked #wikiloveslib the most, for descriptiveness, but I understand the need for brevity. I'm not the most avid Twitter user, in any case, so what do I know? :-) Dominic
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
