> Do you agree with the "consensus points" above?
+1
> (1)
> Should the the components be created and maintained as individual
> subproducts by a set of "component committers"?
+1
> (2)
> Who will approve adding new codebases to the project:
> All the Committers?
+1
By super-majority (3/4's vote)
> (3)
> Is overlap between components acceptable? Is it OK for two components to
> solve the same problem differently?
+1
> (4)
> Do we need a set of super-committers (e.g. PMC members) who can step-up
> when a codebase loses a sole Committer.
+1
I suggest a team of 3 core committers who will take responsibility for
seeing that things like this don't fall through the cracks.
> (5)
> Can the unit of reuse and release be the package?
+1
> (6)
> Should we encourage giving components boring, functional names, to
> emphasize their utilitarian nature?
+1
> (7)
> Start with a pilot Jakarta subproject, and then consider proposing a new
> ASF Project if it works.
+1
-Ted.
