At 04:04 28/2/01 -0800, David Weinrich wrote:
>> I understand it this way too. A not-totally related point is, if it takes
>> more than a few of us more than a few days of digging to really nail down
>> exactly what Avalon is, would it be reasonable to expect a first time
>> visitor to Avalon to understand it as a place to get individual
>> components?
>>
>
>After sending this off I realized that this could be interpreted as a
>criticism of Avalon, which I hadn't intended when I wrote this. Please
>accept my apologies ( the Avalon team in general and also Peter
>specifically, your work/contributions are key to this
>discusssion/project ) for wording this in a pretty poor way :).
Naah theres plenty wrong with Avalon (plenty right aswell) and your
criticism is very mild compared to some of the attacks recently ;)
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
