> I think it would be easier to put them together later, if that made > sense, rather than break them up. That's odd, I was thinking exactly the opposite. Why not just use one list until one component/package gets too much traffic, and then break that out into a separate list? Wouldn't a lot of developers end up subscribing to many or all of the lists anyway? > If we have separate lists, we have choice. If we have one list, we have, > well, spam. If we have separate lists, I think we'll see a lot of cross-posting, and posting to the wrong list. If we follow a convention like "Subject: [Freem] Does Flarkle have to be private *AND* final?" and it should be easy enough to filter/sort to get to the messages you want (and to see when a given component needs a list of its own). - Rod
- Re: Riffing again on another... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Riffing again on another... Peter Donald
- Re: Riffing again on another... Ted Husted
- Re: Riffing again on another... Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Peter Donald
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Ted Husted
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Peter Donald
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Sam Ruby
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Ted Husted
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Waldhoff, Rodney
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Ted Husted
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Ted Husted
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Riffing again on another tan... Remy Maucherat
- Re: Riffing again on another tan... Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: Riffing again on another... Ted Husted
- Re: Riffing again on another tan... David Weinrich
- Re: Riffing again on another tangent Geir Magnusson Jr.
- RE: Riffing again on another tangent Ignacio J. Ortega