https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160684
Cor Nouws <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Cor Nouws <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #7) > (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #6) > > That is completely irrelevant and far sought. > > Maybe if you never change the Default PS. Otherwise it is a fully relevant > and typical usage scenario. Not at all. In many (actually most cases I've ever seen) properties of landscape pages are not tightly bound to these of other pages in the document. > > Still resolves in an invalid report... > > Uh, quite the opposite. I miss any effort to reply to the questions and explanation in my comment 4. So how can you claim these are proving the opposite? This is a waste of time. Just invalid to call the style nonsensical. Rather similar to the left-right page style discussion. Let's focus on where it makes sense: the HMTL page style and maybe the footnote one (didn't look into that yet). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
