https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160684
Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #8) > Not at all. You can deny it all you want, but it is the common scenari. In many (actually most cases I've ever seen) properties of > landscape pages are not tightly bound to these of other pages in the > document. The most common usage scenario is for "landscape pages" to be in the same sequence of pages as the rest of the document - e.g. same book or stapled-together sequence of pages - but with the contents printed as though the page had been rotated. > I miss any effort to reply to the questions and explanation in my comment 4. > So how can you claim these are proving the opposite? Comment 4 is my comment, continuing a reply to Heiko. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
