https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160362
--- Comment #8 from `{3rd: "Beedell", 1st: "Roke"}`{.JSON5}
<[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7)
> (In reply to `{third: "Beedell", first: "Roke"}`{.JSON5} from comment #6)
> > Do you all agree consequently...
>
> > Bug 43089 - Syntax highlighting for Math
> I don't see highlighting of a particular bracket as syntax. => WF
What else do you suppose it is? To my knowledge, punctuation is syntax, and
colouration of punctuation is the purview of a syntax highlighter consequently.
> > Bug 97638 - Beanshell Editor: Add syntax highlighting
> Sure, Beanshell is a macro language with a strong syntax,
> http://www.beanshell.org/manual/syntax.html
In which case, because this issue is WF, why is that not marked so?
> > Bug 160360 - Syntax Highlighting for Markdown
> I don't fully understand this idea but if you expect a Writer text to be
> saved as or loaded from md my take here is also WF.
That's not what it requests, although in this case, it's actually somewhat
subjective: Because text/markdown is text/, it means that it's - for LO's
purposes, except this request - equivalent to /plain. Consequently, if *this*
issue had not been resolved as WF, extending the syntax highlighter to
/markdown would have been feasible and desired due to significant community
interest.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
