https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162632
--- Comment #14 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #12) > I don't know what would be the best approach to disentangle the "to" and > attachment in case of xdg-email. Always just have an empty "to" in case of > xdg-email? We are always sending docs after all, so attachment will always > be present. And where do we have UI where the recipients are filled? How > broadly are these senddoc programs used? CmdMailSuppl is an implementation of SimpleCommandMail published service [1]. It is used both in our code - for the SfxMailModel::Send (where it allows to have "to" field set), and in external scripts (see e.g. [2]). So you may safely assume, that "to" is widely used. But you didn't specify, what is the entanglement here? Do you mean, that the problem that you mentioned in comment 9 only happens when both "to=" and "attach=" are there inside the "mailto:"; URI? Can we safely assume, that xdg-email *always* allows to use its separate --attach argument? If so, I don't see a problem: when using xdg-email, just use "--attach=...", not "mailto:...attach=...";. [1] https://api.libreoffice.org/docs/idl/ref/servicecom_1_1sun_1_1star_1_1system_1_1SimpleCommandMail.html [2] https://ask.libreoffice.org/search?q=SimpleCommandMail -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
