https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162632
--- Comment #15 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #14) > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #12) > > I don't know what would be the best approach to disentangle the "to" and > > attachment in case of xdg-email. Always just have an empty "to" in case of > > xdg-email? We are always sending docs after all, so attachment will always > > be present. And where do we have UI where the recipients are filled? How > > broadly are these senddoc programs used? > > CmdMailSuppl is an implementation of SimpleCommandMail published service > [1]. It is used both in our code - for the SfxMailModel::Send (where it > allows to have "to" field set), and in external scripts (see e.g. [2]). > > So you may safely assume, that "to" is widely used. > But you didn't specify, what is the entanglement here? Do you mean, that the > problem that you mentioned in comment 9 only happens when both "to=" and > "attach=" are there inside the "mailto:"; URI? Can we safely assume, that > xdg-email *always* allows to use its separate --attach argument? If so, I > don't see a problem: when using xdg-email, just use "--attach=...", not > "mailto:...attach=...";. Yeah, the issue is only with mailto:...attach= indeed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
