https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163974
--- Comment #8 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jambunathan K from comment #0) > 1 Broader Question > ================== > > The broader questions are these; > > - what does OpenDocumentFormat say about "nested" foonotes and how > does LO handle it. Specifically, can LO create the equivalent of > what I see in `nested-footnote-definition.pdf` (This `pdf` file is > created with `tex`) Have you done your own research? The ODF spec is open, and without your own research, this looks like putting a load on others "just because". https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.4/OpenDocument-v1.4-part3-schema.html#element-text_note-body > Note: The schema allows for the inclusion of <text:note> elements as a > descendant of a child of the <text:note-body> element. While this may be > reasonable for note types, it is not reasonable for footnotes and endnotes. > Conforming consumers need not support notes inside notes. So while the syntax is formally OK, the semantics is the one that is explicitly mentioned as optionally unsupported. The "should there be a repairment offered" is a reasonable question. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
