https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163974
--- Comment #10 from Jambunathan K <[email protected]> --- > Have you done your own research? The ODF spec is open, and without your own > research, this looks like putting a load on others "just because". This is intentional ... When I get a note from Regina (or some one higher up), I know that my bug report will NOT be moved by a "bot" to NEEDINFO state and subsequently going to garbage bin for "NO ACTION BY BUG SUBMITTER". This is not any worse than some QA folks moving my bugs to NEEDINFO state (with a note to test this with newer version of LO), and subsequently "CLOSING" my bug with "NO RESPONSE FROM FILER OF BUGS". ----------------- Instead of shouting at me, you should thank me a detailed report, so that an INFORMED person (like you( can act on within a few minutes. That is HOW DETAILED my bug report is. I have been maintaining Emacs ODT exporter since 2010 or so, and foolish to claim IDLENESS or IGNORANCE on my part. ------------ A "professional" response from the LO dev team would be to say "LO doesn't support this construct" or "LO can mimic the TeX engine" or "ODF 1.2 are whatever doesn't allow nested footnotes. May be it can be used a use case for future proposal to ODF 1000.x" and OASIS cannot talk about LO does (even though it is understood that much what got in to OASIS in first place is through OO and LO efforts) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
