https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155110
--- Comment #5 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jack Appelmans from comment #4) > Why the analyst concluded that this was just another "user error" seems > unclear; there is no basis in the case file for that determination. In fact, > the indications that the new bookmarks appeared after the software version > upgrade, but didn't exist in the document prior to conversion, suggests that > the app itself manufactured them, not the user. > > Despite the analyst's baseless assertion, the bug case report is not > "invalid", which makes the resolution arbitrary. I've worked in QA, led QA > teams, led entire software projects and both government and commercial > software development programs and project offices. I'm [disappointed] at the > cursory, flawed and casually dismissive approach the analyst took to address > this issue. A status change is not an irrevocable decision. If you have reproducible steps, I'm all ears. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
