https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168593
--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #9) > Sorry, but while *Translation* of the standard Unicode glyph names might be > in scope of our l10n efforts, any effort to devise We shouldn't devise this ourselves of course. > a viable range of > descriptive alias (in English) for some subset of Unicode would be > unsupportable This is Unicode characters, not our UI. Our UI changes. Assigned Unicode code points basically don't change. > and of limited use as its scope would be so constrained. The use is that you can search for characters by their name. Which right now, you can't really, i.e. you can only use the official version of their name, which you don't know to begin with. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
