https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173245
Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INVALID |--- Summary|Need block shapes for |Need basic block shapes for |arithmetic operations, |arithmetic operations, |equality & inequality |equality & inequality Keywords| |needsUXEval Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #1) > They are already included in the Gallery in section "Shapes". So, we do have such shapes in the gallery, that's true, but - they don't behave like basic shapes: Their color is not the same when added; and they have a shadow when added. > I see no need > to add them to a floater in the drawing toolbar or to the menu. I do. I think they express more basic concepts than, say, an octagon bevel, or a concave six-pointed star. And it also can't make sense for us to have a bunch of flowchart shapes like "sequential process" etc., which are much more rarely in use, but not have basic mathematical and logical operators. > > We may also want to consider: > > * Less-or-equal ( ≤ ) > > * Greater-or-equal ( ≥ ) > > They do not belong to OOXML and were not part of the binary MSO formats. That's why I made that a suggestion. But again, they still make much more sense as basic shapes as some of what we have right now. > However, they could be added to the "Shapes" section in the Gallery. If anything, we could move the flowchart shapes into the Gallery and have an algebra/math collection. Would make a lot more sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
