https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59326
Harald Koester <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.freedesktop.or | |g/show_bug.cgi?id=71920, | |https://bugs.freedesktop.or | |g/show_bug.cgi?id=71921 --- Comment #2 from Harald Koester <[email protected]> --- Hi Joel, for (2) and (3) I created new bug reports: Bug 71920, bug 71921. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + By the way some words according to your marking of bugs: In order to clarify how bugs are prioritised TMO it is a good thing to comment this - like you did it here - in bug reports. Some time ago I thought about something similar: What about writing a short summary of the bug triage. It may look like this: ---------- Bug triaged according "https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage": Step 2: No duplicates found. Step 3: Information complete and comprehensible. Step 4: Reproducible with version 4.1.3, OS: Win 7 Step 5: Status set to NEW. Platform set to "All", because reproducible with Win and Linux. Step 6: Prioritisation: "Normal" - can prevent professional quality work "Medium" - default seems appropriate as this isn't a regression and probably not impacting a ton of people. --------- Pros: (1) It is reproducible, which triage steps have been performed and which still have to be performed. (2) For a bug reporter it's more transparent what happens with "her/his" bug. (3) People recognise how triaging works and are encouraged to join triaging. Con: Some more writing. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
