https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56076
--- Comment #17 from Khaled Hosny <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > There should be no glyph substitution at all: the text processor is not a > > > web browser and should give to user precise control over the fonts and > > > characters used. > > > > You are confusing word presossors which should just work (i.e. always give > > the user some readible text) with typesetting systems (some times called > > DTP), which should give the typsetter the finest control about the final > > output. > > There is 'no control' and there is 'the finest control', but I think many > folks would settle for a little more control (than there is now) over the > text appearance in LibO. The 'faces list' which is acceptable to HAVE in the > ODF should have some EFFECT as well. That reply wasn’t to you, but anyway, you can control this by properly configuring FontConfig to your liking, LibreOffice shouldn’t reinvent FontConfig (which does its job quite nicely and have versatile configurability). > Why's the bug title substitution not automated to take serifed glyphs for > the serifed body font, at least? Not sure I get what you mean here. > Why're the bitmapped fonts excluded from being UI font, BTW? Ditto. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
