https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56076
--- Comment #18 from Yury <[email protected]> --- Well, go ahead and consider this solved, but this resolution IS INVALID (see below). (In reply to comment #17) > That reply wasn’t to you, but anyway, you can control this by properly > configuring FontConfig to your liking, LibreOffice shouldn’t reinvent > FontConfig (which does its job quite nicely and have versatile > configurability). LibO plainly makes INCORRECT USE of fontconfig features. The mentioned sans-serifed glyph substituted for glyph not present in serifed (installed!) font face is quite an example of this. See screenshots attached. I have strings in serifed faces which get glyph from sans-serifed face substituted. And there ARE serifed faces with that glyph installed on my system. What further "proper" configuring do I "need" to do? Isn't this advice actually going too far? *** > > Why're the bitmapped fonts excluded from being UI font, BTW? > > Ditto. There are no raster fonts in list of choices in the fonts substitution dialog (where one may choose a replacement for Andale Sans UI or Segoe UI faces). Why so? I understand that rasters may be not a good choice for a content, but why exclude those from UI use? I don't like begging, and so have earlier looked in the source myself. Unfortunately, the code proved to be too convoluted for me, but I have noticed that raster fonts are somehow excluded from the fonts list (used, e.g., in fonts substitution dialog). I didn't manage to find the fontconfig request in question. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
