https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44719
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meeks <[email protected]> 2012-01-17 10:14:29 PST --- Created attachment 55690 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55690 tweaked version of known-bad patch for testing ... So the bad news is that, yes reverting this patch makes rather a substantial difference. export OOO_EXIT_POST_STARTUP=1 ; export OOO_DISABLE_RECOVERY=1 ; export RTLd; rm -f $RTL_LOGFILE ; ./soffice.bin /tmp/test.pptx ; cat $RTL_LOGFILE ... 189365 1 } PERFORMANCE - DesktopOpenClients_Impl() and adding the revert / lamers cache: ... 044013 1 } PERFORMANCE - DesktopOpenClients_Impl() So - 44 seconds is already not so ideal for this, particularly when compared to the ~5 seconds it takes to load in Powerpoint on the same machine ;-) But 189 seconds is really a lot worse ;-) 4x slower. Having said that - at 44 seconds, we have do be doing something -really- pretty dumb here, 113 slides 300ms per slide to open it ? it seems amazing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
