https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67370
--- Comment #19 from Qubit <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #18) > I tried this an another online validator, and both are happy even with no > ActualText at all, which makes me skeptic about their usefulness (unless > PDF/A-1a does not actually require tagged PDF). It appears that PDF/A-1a does require a tagged PDF: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDF/A#PDF.2FA-1 "PDF/A-1a includes all the requirements of PDF/A-1b and additionally requires: * document structure must be included (hierarchy) * Tagged PDF (use of alternative texts for images, tagging text spans and giving them an ID, replacement texts for symbols) ..." And ActualText does sound very similar: http://webaim.org/discussion/mail_thread?thread=4817 "From Adobe's Help for InDesign CS 5.5: "PDF also supports actual text, in addition to Alt text. Actual text can be applied to graphic elements that visually look like text. For example, a scanned TIFF image. Actual text is used to represent words that were converted to artwork. Actual text is only applicable for tagged PDFs." Sooo... I'm not sure. Perhaps we could ask someone at Adobe and/or at one of these validator companies? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
