https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51819

--- Comment #56 from [email protected] ---
@Joel Madero
Thanks, got the lesson, Mr. QA!

Just please take a look on this issue, what you (QA) and what we (users) did to
get this issue solved.

QA: suggesting to download and install the old versions (which in fact was a
good idea), but not really more, not even accepted the Hard Hack.
Users: we found the routine, where (with high probability) the problem is,
worked out patches, found the first version for the problem, etc.

Yes, I was a bit (too) pushy, but without this IMHO we were nowhere near now.
You had 1,5 years to solve this issue on your own agenda, which brought what:
literally nothing!

I really do not understand your attitude toward users trying to patch a
security (!) regression (!): you are handling us as we were some criminals,
etc. Instead of being glad to have such responsible users who are BTW doing
your duties (the QA or an automated test should catch such security regressions
even before publishing).

Don't worry, I will not comment on this bug anymore, or on any other one.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to