https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44135
Michael Meeks <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG --- Comment #63 from Michael Meeks <[email protected]> --- Hi James; great to have a CUPS / ghostscript / PDF hacker commenting at last :-) Thanks for the great input > Looking at pdf generated by 4.2.1.1, I don’t see anything in it which > should be controversial. Glad you don't see anything objectionable in our PDF stream =) As such I will close this as NOTOURBUG - agreed - not the perfect resolution, but this points to it. > The best LO could do is offer an option on export and printing to ... This would be a great feature request to file; I'm not sure that people will love to file it, but perhaps there is indeed code to identify which pieces of the page to bitmap-ify, though there really is a reason why we prefer a meta-file format that handles transparency well ;-) Either, way, please do file a new print dialog option / enhancement feature bug for that and link it to this with SeeAlso etc. It'd be nice to attach the single, most minimal test document from here to it as well - this bug got rather horribly un-readably unwieldy by now =) Thanks for everyone's input. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
