https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87613
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- Agree with Cor, alphabetizing probably does not gain much for the UX. And adds a whole lot of work to implement alpha sort consistently for all l10n/i18n. Q: Rather than alphabetizing of our labels, would standardizing our listbox ordering with groupings more closely following the sequence of the SMIL 2.0 transition taxonomy (ref) by type and sub-type (which would of course be language neutral) provide a more consistent UI? On the transition listbox--"No transition" would remain the top item, and place "Random transition" next. Then follow in listing ordered as groped by the SMIL 2.0 type and sub-type? -=ref=- http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/smil-transitions.html#TransitionEffects-Appendix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
