https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87613
--- Comment #8 from Jay Philips <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 111232 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=111232&action=edit grouping of transitions in powerpoint, wps, and iworks (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #6) > Want I mean to say< what do you win with this? You win by seeing an understandable list of sorted transitions. > Some items will stay together because of the naming (Shape Plus, Shape > Diamond, Shape Circle) anyway also in Dutch I've no idea if that is the case > for all translations. I expect when some translate as "Plus Shape", "Diamond > Shape" etc. then there is a problem. Yes i wondered how it would play out in different languages. > Further, the current sorting is not random. Fade Through Black and Cut > Through Black for example, are nicely together now. And there are more of > those groups that are not alphabetical. Well we have Dissolve in the middle of the list and Fine Dissolve at the bottom of the list, so they are not always nicely placed together. Maybe it would be useful to have them sorted within groups, so related transitions stay together. I've seem similar grouping done in Powerpoint, WPS Presentation and iWork Keynote. I have also suggested in bug 87621, that transition variants/directions could be moved to its own list in the sidebar to make the list easier to go through. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
