https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89482
--- Comment #7 from Justin L <[email protected]> --- I am pretty sure that _Toc is an MSWord-only convention, and that __Refheader__ is a comparable LO convention. So after a long review, I think my original "fix" is still conceptually valid. (see CrossRefBookmark.cxx, as well as all of the "ensure __Refheader__ prefix whenever isTocBookmark is true). Not all references to __Refheader__ bookmarks update aReferencedTOCBookmarks, and ww8par.cxx deletes any TOC bookmarks that aren't there (and thus this regression). Since ww8par.cxx is primarily concerned about importing Word's .doc format, I think it is safe to change it so that ONLY "_Toc" bookmarks that are not referenced are deleted. That would leave all LibreOffice generated bookmarks intact. However, this doesn't resolve another complication: Only ONE crossreferenceBookmark is allowed - so that might cause other regressions if more than one bookmark attempts to reference the same header. (sw/source/core/doc/docbm.cxx:383: MarkManager::makeMark(..) - refusing to create duplicate CrossRefBookmark) Alternative 1) Reverse bug 68963 and find out why a REFERENCE *must* be marked as a TOC in order to be visible. (I haven't been able to discover why). This would be the ideal alternative if possible. Alternative 2) In the CrossRefHeadingBookmark constructor, append a "_Toc" to the prefix. This might work without causing regressions, but it would affect all of LO, not just .doc. This would only affect newly created documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
