https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88697
--- Comment #22 from Yury <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #21) > it does indeed appear that enum values > 95 do not actually exist in binary > DOC format. > > suspect that your patch will fix the WW8 export but break the DOCX export. More like, it fixes the .DOC export if the receiver is real word2003, but breaks it, if the receiver is newer word or something like that. The number 97 had to come from somewhere, right? However, anyway, there is no field 97 in format specification, so the source definitely has to be changed in that matter. Possibly, make LO to distinguish between export to pure word2003 doc or to extended format (like, word2003++)? > one thing that is perhaps worth trying is, export the fields to DOCX, > import that in Word, export it to DOC and see what kind of field that writes Would it even work with real word2003? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
