https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88697
Michael Stahl <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|bibisected dataLoss |bibisected dataLoss |target:5.0.0 | --- Comment #24 from Michael Stahl <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Yury from comment #22) > (In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #21) > > it does indeed appear that enum values > 95 do not actually exist in binary > > DOC format. > > > > suspect that your patch will fix the WW8 export but break the DOCX export. > > More like, it fixes the .DOC export if the receiver is real word2003, but > breaks it, if the receiver is newer word or something like that. The number > 97 had to come from somewhere, right? i believe the numbers 96 and 97 were made up by the author of the patch in comment #11 without any actual knowledge of WW8 format, purely for use in DOCX where the actual *numbers* are not written into the file. > > one thing that is perhaps worth trying is, export the fields to DOCX, > > import that in Word, export it to DOC and see what kind of field that writes > > Would it even work with real word2003? probably not, that can't import DOCX, need a later version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
