https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37089
--- Comment #32 from Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> --- (In reply to KumÄra from comment #29) > Marc, since the website detects the visitor's OS and offers the exact > version, I suppose you can have it indicate the JRE compatible to that > version. So, assuming me knowledge is correct (on 32/64bit): I think this is heading in the wrong direction. The download page can probably detect the user's OS and also its "bit-ness" (32 vs. 64), but that is not the most relevant thing here. What is relevant is that if a user downloads a 32 bit LO for a 64 bit OS, to alert them that they need a 32 bit JRE. (When downloading a 64 bit LO for a 64 bit OS, technically, one could also alert the user that they need a 64 bit JRE; but they are much more likely anyway to use a 64 bit JRE on a 64 bit OS than to use a 32 bit JRE on a 64 bit OS, as required in the case above, so any such alert would probably cause more confusion than good. When downloading a 32 bit LO for a 32 bit OS, the user can only have a 32 bit JRE on that OS anyway. And downloading a 64 bit LO for a 32 bit OS is not possible at all.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
