https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42788
--- Comment #28 from jan iversen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Christopher M. Penalver from comment #27) > jan iversen, could you please post the direct URL of the notes of the gerrit > you are referring to (versus make folks dumpster dive for it via a search > engine, etc.)? Not a bad idea, will have to dig it out. > > There is nothing in > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/ > ?id=6517141b6233c5f9667031bc92f66109fddf5b76 that discusses any regression > potential, or side effects. > > Also, given the scope of this report is confirmed fixed, I'm not sure what > the value is in reopening it. Instead, it may be better to open a net new > report, reporting in detail any confirmed or potential regression. > Well if you revert a change (that you committed) it seems natural to reopen the bug as well. Opening a new bug with the same text can of course be done. Please be aware that I (among others) confirmed it fixed, and was later made aware that this patch caused problems with higher indent levels. It was the hope that the author of the patch would submit a fix, but with a new release candicate due next week, a revert was needed. > Also, please mark yourself CC on reports you make comments to, so you get > any follow up emails that requests a response. Now why would I do that ? I get mail on these issues already. You might not have noted it, but all easyhacks was changed a while ago, so I get CC from all of them instead of filling up the dev list. rgds jan i. > > Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
