https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42788
--- Comment #29 from Christopher M. Penalver <[email protected]> --- (In reply to jan iversen from comment #28) > (In reply to Christopher M. Penalver from comment #27) > > jan iversen, could you please post the direct URL of the notes of the gerrit > > you are referring to (versus make folks dumpster dive for it via a search > > engine, etc.)? > Not a bad idea, will have to dig it out. If it is more convenient, would you have the revert commit URL instead? > > > > There is nothing in > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/ > > ?id=6517141b6233c5f9667031bc92f66109fddf5b76 that discusses any regression > > potential, or side effects. > > > > Also, given the scope of this report is confirmed fixed, I'm not sure what > > the value is in reopening it. Instead, it may be better to open a net new > > report, reporting in detail any confirmed or potential regression. > > > Well if you revert a change (that you committed) it seems natural to reopen > the bug as well. > > Opening a new bug with the same text can of course be done. Whatever makes sense here is fine with me (especially since the commit was reverted). > > Also, please mark yourself CC on reports you make comments to, so you get > > any follow up emails that requests a response. > > Now why would I do that ? I get mail on these issues already. You might not > have noted it, but all easyhacks was changed a while ago, so I get CC from > all of them instead of filling up the dev list. This is another request to please stop making people dumpster dive for information. Nobody except for a few know that, and expecting others to either know this, or dumpster dive for this, is putting an unnecessary onus on others. > rgds > jan i. > > > > > > Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
