https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258

--- Comment #20 from Pedro <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #17)
> the registrymodifications.xcu is *meant* to be small, as it only contains
> stuff that the user configures and hence differs from the defaults.
> 
> That file isn't even part of the package, but created by LO when it launches.

We are aware of that...

> Even if that file would be to blame, the problem would be reproducible by
> not only you three, but by everyone who would try the admin installation
> method.

You forgot 3 details: 1) The problem "only" affects Win 8+ ; 2) Comment #10 "I
tested with both x86 and x64, installed in parallel with SI GUI and standard
install." 3) Maybe only the 3 of us bothered to report? Does it require more
than 3 people???

> Besides that: Why did nobody bother to actually attach working and
> non-working registrymodifications.xcu?

Good point. Done.

> According to the logic presented here, replacing a working
> registrymodifications.xcu with the "too short" one would also provoke the
> crash.
> And did anyone try whether that then also causes a regular installation to
> fail in the same way?

That doesn't work because there isn't any "good" TDF Master build to test
with...
It doesn't crash 5.1.3.1 (x64) though
But it is a different branch so it doesn't prove much...

> so once again: What is "unexpectedly short"? is it invalid xml because LO
> was killed while writing it/is it incomplete file? Or just pristine config
> with no user-overrides?

No, it is not incomplete but an almost empty xml. See attachments.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to