https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102230

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
                   |                            |.freedesktop.org
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> ---
(In reply to Octavio Alvarez from comment #2)
> 
> The problem is that this document has a direct "do not underline" formatting
> applied.
> 

> [1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83726#c13
> [2] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89960#c1
> 
> My suggestion is for this bug to be closed as duplicate of #89960.

Sorry, I missed that direct formatting was present and was only using the Edit
Style dialog process. Opening the test document ODF archive, within the
content.xml, both the Heading_20_2 and derived P7 have
"text-underline-style=none" direct formatting (DF) applied.

Using Find & Replace: Paragraph Styles mode, and removing the DF with <Ctrl>+M
for each Heading2 based paragraph permits the Edit Style changes to underline
assert.

Agree this demonstrates a clear Direct Formatting trap as addressed for
enhancement in bug 89960 -- NOTABUG but closing as duplicate for needed UX
attention.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89960 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to