https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95416
Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--- Comment #33 from Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> ---
But isn't it *using* stuff from a wrong include file that indicates something
is wrong, not where the include file is located? Anyway, I'm fine with
resolving this as NOTABUG; Eike is right that no easy hacker will understand
the subtleties involved. Not even I do.
Should we instead then have a difficultyInteresting easyHack (a contradiction
in terms...) to find these includes and fix the code to not need stuff from
such a "wrong" include file at all?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
