https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106781
--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
Jay, *
Not opposed as I think current standard and formatting toolbars over emphasize
Direct formatting rather than applying Styles, but wouldn't this be more in
line with MUFFIN customizations of the Sidebar or the Notebookbar?
Shouldn't the legacy Toolbars (admittedly now mostly Glade .UI configured) be
added to scope of MUFFIN?
The mockup is fine, but as I note on bug 106681#c2 the drop list widget for
Character styles is more concise and can actually hold all the available
styles--rather than trying to decide on a specific set of buttons to provide on
the toolbar.
And of course, question becomes how these additional toolbar controls are made
available. Are they core .src provided like other "legacy" toolbars, exposed
from the View -> Toolbar menu--or would they be packaged as .oxt extensions to
skin the UI with the tools and layout a user prefers to work with?
Working out details to do the latter for all the MUFFIN resources would provide
a lot more flexibility.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
