https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34133
--- Comment #68 from Cor Nouws <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Luke from comment #67)
> We are talking about DESTRUCTIVE EDITS. This assumption that it can just be
> "fixed", is only true if the user still has access to the original, notices
> it, and it aware of this backwards workflow. If users are familiar with
> ...
Hé Luke,
I think there is agreement on your point that quality is important and that the
workflow must give users and organizations the control and clarity they need to
reach that. We must make sure to put that process in place very well.
IMO the ideas given here fit that purpose. Is there anything missing in your
opinion?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
