https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115981

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu

--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> ---
And it is a trivial and consistent action to swipe the Deck size inward (to
left) to open it past minimal width and swipe outward (to right) to drop it
back to the decks minimum.

I do prefer to be able to shrink all the decks past their minimum (I use Style
or Gallery deck which allow shrink to collapse). Allowing me to give up
exposure of some of the controls to be able to hold the document canvas at a
set scale with fixed width. And I want my "customization" to profile to
included these settings.

As was noted on the the other WF issue, having the Sidbar deck expand and
contract to a set minimum would be annoying as it would impact the canvas
(obscure it or resize it depending on mode).

The width controls for the decks are fine as the are, beleive Heiko had an idea
of providing a "double hash" to indicate Content Panel controls hidden--and on
click to expose (by drop list, or wrapped toolbar) the additional controls--or
even fully expand to minimum width the deck.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to