https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103947

Adrien <adrien.montele...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Adrien <adrien.montele...@gmail.com> ---
Coming here from Bug 116686
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116686:

I've yet to encounter any such corruption, either using export, or using the
Print to functionality, but I understand why this was marked as WONTFIX, but
then the bug isn't the lack of functionality (for very good reasons), but a
poor UX handling of the situation.

A user should not be thrown an error without explanation or have to figure out
options on their own. If you don't want people editing PDF's with LO, then
don't allow them to edit PDF's with LO. Why is that functionality there at all?
Why isn't the PDF imported as read only? What's the point?

Why not warn the user they'll have to export as a different file name, or how
doing this at all risks the corruption you speak of?

This bug should be re-opened, at least with respect to how the error is handled
with the user.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to