https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120335
--- Comment #7 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Gabor Kelemen from comment #6)
> ...
> git bisect good 5c832bc2dea41cbda669a77971d5a69f2b186261
> # good: [0b51d3583f896a4023435da050bd21c98cacd469] source
> sha:6f45e696874401a224fa6c3c6b299933b3ae793f
> git bisect good 0b51d3583f896a4023435da050bd21c98cacd469
> # first bad commit: [dfac264c22b92910f335912ebd67e23ae64c29f0] source
> sha:642a49e8d3006d000bc6c58def34d4e96764c6cc
>
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/
> ?id=642a49e8d3006d000bc6c58def34d4e96764c6cc
>
> In other words, when saving to SP was fixed in bug #116420 this was already
> broken. Maybe by something earlier than that, but I can't really verify.
So it means that you marked "good" the versions that failed with lockfile
problems, so you couldn't really verify those?
Could you please checkout cab3468e96552348ae46121a490f1f6160b65213, (the one
before 6ca3b3648e25ae9d4d2d29a0df83349198ec3f5e which was fixed in
642a49e8d3006d000bc6c58def34d4e96764c6cc) and test if it's ok or bad there?
That was in 6.0, and you need to find relevant bibisect commit using git log
--grep cab3468e96552348ae46121a490f1f6160b65213
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
