https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125919
--- Comment #6 from Aron Budea <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #4)
> I think it would make sense to bisect this one, it's not obvious to me what
> is the problem here.
>
> Could you state a version where this was good?
I reverted the commits in bug 125814, bug 125791 and bug 101086, and tested
after each, and the bug only disappeared with the revert of bug 101086's fix.
Reverted commits in order:
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/7aaa7212f2f37606b34d44a039398f05c02d5660%5E%21
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/47dbbe214641b9a28871d0c82f71b2afb9c5943c%5E%21
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/4dadbff74eff5f8ad00df99c659f8a2b914e09a1%5E%21
6.4 Win bibisect builds should be ready in a few days, the result can be
double-checked then.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
