https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109158
--- Comment #60 from tommy27 <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #58)
> (In reply to tommy27 from comment #55)
> > however the performance is still worse than 5.3.7 where it was quite fast.
> >
> > as mentioned several time, the regression happened in 6.0.x development
> > (comment 11) and a bibisect regarding the offending committ is available in
> > comment 13 but it seems it has never been addressed.
>
> It is a question of being exact with text widths. Using approximate width
> caused problems. So like Caolán said in comment 12, it cannot be called a
> regression in the traditional sense.
sorry but I've never fully understood what Caolan meant (that's because I have
no proper code knowledge).
even if that was not a "traditional regression" it seems if was that committ
that caused the performance drop from 5.3.x to 6.0.x
then another, even worse, performance regression happened between 6.1.x and
6.2.x but Noel just fixed it.
I hope another commit will restore the nice performance of 5.3.x as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
