https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57959
--- Comment #20 from [email protected] --- (In reply to comment #18) > As a newbie I am not sure what the latest comment means ("We shouldn't set > this bug to highest importance and a blocker. For databases I would only > choose this, if the whole data of a database could be deleted") Does this > mean that 'we should not spend too much time or effort on this', or 'this is > not really a bug' or 'people could get along as is' etc As Lionel explained: It's a bug, when report-designer doesn't work. But it isn't a blocker for the whole LO. You don't have values above 'Importance' "highest", "blocker". There was, for example, a bug in LO 3.6.0. When I closed a database in a special configuration of Linux-rpm and opened it again all data were lost - tables, queries, forms and reports. How would you call this, when a non-working-reportbuilder is "highest" and "blocker". This bug was reported for 4.0.0.0.alpha1. Seems to be a special bug for Linux with deb-packages. There is no other open bug-report for "report-builder doesn't work". Where is reported, that it wouldn't work since LO 3.5? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
