https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145305
--- Comment #10 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Aron Budea from comment #9) > As I understand, the version is something like 10.0.22000 (or even > 10.0.22000.348, considering patch levels), and the About dialog already > doesn't report version like that, taking it from a random bug report: > "Windows 10.0 Build 22000". Both 10.0 and 22000 are parts of a single NT version. The parts of the version are documented here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winnt/ns-winnt-osversioninfoexa . The parts are: major version; minor version; build number (, ...). And "10.0.22000" is just one of available ways to display that information. Mixing *another* number - e.g., 11 - with build number from NT version is wrong. If later MS releases NT 11.0.0001, and starts counting builds, names it "Windows 123", and we get a conflict, when Windows 11 means unclear thing - a person who knows true NT versions (always available wherever you search for build numbers) would not know if "Windows 11 build 22000" referred to Windows 11 aka NT 10.0, or to Windows 123 aka NT 11.0? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
