https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145305
--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #10) > (In reply to Aron Budea from comment #9) > > As I understand, the version is something like 10.0.22000 (or even > > 10.0.22000.348, considering patch levels), and the About dialog already > > doesn't report version like that, taking it from a random bug report: > > "Windows 10.0 Build 22000". > > Both 10.0 and 22000 are parts of a single NT version. The parts of the > version are documented here: > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winnt/ns-winnt- > osversioninfoexa . The parts are: major version; minor version; build number > (, ...). And "10.0.22000" is just one of available ways to display that > information. Mixing *another* number - e.g., 11 - with build number from NT > version is wrong. If later MS releases NT 11.0.0001, and starts counting > builds, names it "Windows 123", and we get a conflict, when Windows 11 means > unclear thing - a person who knows true NT versions (always available > wherever you search for build numbers) would not know if "Windows 11 build > 22000" referred to Windows 11 aka NT 10.0, or to Windows 123 aka NT 11.0? So I don't see a problem reporting it as "Windows 11 version 10.0.22000". Just make sure that NT version is displayed in unambiguous, unmodified way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
