https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141456
Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> ---
Heiko, we're in the middle of a conversation, so please don't just close this
as WONTFIX.
Anyway...
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #7)
> and for now, LibreOffice only
> uses outline level of paragraphs to e.g. create ToC.
Also for numbering. But I'll grant you it's not that much. What's really
bothering me is seeing non-headings in the tree for headings.
> what is
> the intended *use case* for what you propose; what *real-life problem*
> should if solve.
I have a document with heading styles applied, but also with paragraph style
which have an outline level. They're not section headings. I don't want to see
them in Headings view in navigator. They have an outline level because I want
them to participate in numbering.
I understand that you're stating, or claiming, that Outline level = Heading
level. But as long as different names are used, then they're not. These words
are not synonyms.
You mentioned an official LO definition - can you link to it?
I must say this reminds me of another inconsistent annoyance, which is that in
LO, Outlines = Chapters, but the project refuses to name things consistently
(bug 141452). Oh yes, I see you mentioned this too.
So, with this additional artificial synonym, we now have:
Outlines = Headings = Chapters
any of those two false equivalencies is annoying, but how can you seriously
defend both of them, while keeping the triple-inconsistent names?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
