https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141456

Mike Kaganski <mikekagan...@hotmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #12 from Mike Kaganski <mikekagan...@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10)
> What's really bothering me is seeing non-headings in the tree for headings.
> 
> ...
> 
> I have a document with heading styles applied, but also with paragraph style
> which have an outline level. They're not section headings. I don't want to
> see them in Headings view in navigator. They have an outline level because I
> want them to participate in numbering.

The participation of outline levels in numbering means what exactly? I *guess*
you mean things like table captions or formula numbering (created using
respective numbering fields); and the intended use of that feature is exactly
per-chapter numbering - thus the outline level being a synonym of chapter is
clear, again. But indeed, one is not forced to use features only as intended -
any creative (mis)use is OK. But when one would use outline levels for that,
one could limit the outline levels in Navigator to only those levels that are
used for chapters.

Again: using features outside of their intended use (outline level of
paragraphs = (sub)chapter heading) is OK, but not a reason to introduce some
changes that make everyone's life (except yours) much harder. Most (MOST) users
would be confused (to put it politely) if your proposal is implemented.

> I understand that you're stating, or claiming, that Outline level = Heading
> level. But as long as different names are used, then they're not. These
> words are not synonyms.

They are. The "words" in any program are not "words of human language". They
are terms, and they mean specific things in the program, and that meaning
should not (and cannot) match all the breadth of meaning the human language
word bears. The LibreOffice Writer's Outline level is the same as LibreOffice
Writer's Heading level. Period.

> Outlines = Headings = Chapters
> 
> any of those two false equivalencies is annoying, but how can you seriously
> defend both of them, while keeping the triple-inconsistent names?

So - your problem in this discussion is just that you believe that you know how
we should use words, and if we are allowed or not to use some of them as
synonyms. And you know what, you may discuss that (renaming the three to a
single term), and it might even make sense - but it is not what this issue is
about.

Closing WONTFIX again (in fact, it should be INVALID, because WONTFIX means
"there's a problem, but resolving it is undesirable", while this is "I do not
want to believe that the term means what it really means"). Nothing to discuss
here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to