https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149617
Julien Nabet <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff | |ice.org See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95 | |394 --- Comment #8 from Julien Nabet <[email protected]> --- If we pick "Image", we should revert patches for tdf#95394 I suppose. About "Bitmap", do we consider it became a kind of generic term equivalent to "raster image"? Just my personal opinion but "Bitmap" is one of a format of "raster image", so would prefer "raster image". At least people won't believe they can't use png files. Of course 2 pbs here: - it's a bit long - not sure any casual user knows the signification of "raster" So I took a look what Microsoft used in Powerpoint and read this link: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/change-the-background-of-your-slides-in-powerpoint-for-the-web-6927cd06-5a5b-483e-9d98-6e270df45700 It seems they chose "Picture", IHMO a good choice since: - it's not too long - everybody understands - rather implies raster In brief: - Image: too generic - Bitmap: too much related to the format - Raster image: too long and not understandable for everyone - Picture: don't see cons here only advantages :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
